واکاوی وجوه اشتراک و افتراق در فرایند شکل‌گیری طرح‌های معماری دو سبک سنتی ایرانی و معماری پایدار معاصر

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد معماری، مؤسسۀ آموزش عالی جهاد دانشگاهی خوزستان، اهواز، ایران.

2 نویسنده مسئول، استادیار، عضو هیئت علمی گروه مهندسی معماری مؤسسۀ آموزش عالی جهاد دانشگاهی خوزستان، اهواز، ایران.

10.22091/bonyan.2026.15490.1013

چکیده

معماری سنتی ایران حاصل قرن‌ها تجربه زیست‌محیطی، فرهنگی و اقلیمی است و در فرایند شکل‌گیری خود، راهکارهایی هوشمندانه برای دستیابی به آسایش انسان و هماهنگی با طبیعت ارائه کرده است. در مقابل، معماری پایدار با تکیه بر رویکردهای علمی، فناوری‌های نوین و دغدغه‌های زیست‌محیطی، در پی کاهش اثرات منفی ساخت‌وساز بر محیط و ارتقای کیفیت زندگی انسان است. این مقاله با هدف واکاوی وجوه اشتراک و افتراق در فرایند شکل‌گیری طرح‌های معماری سنتی ایرانی و معماری پایدار معاصر تدوین شده است. روش پژوهش کیفی و مبتنی بر مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای، توصیفی ـ تحلیلی و مقایسه‌ای است که در آن، مؤلفه‌های مؤثر بر فرایند شکل‌گیری طرح در معماری سنتی ایران و معماری پایدار معاصر استخراج و به‌صورت تطبیقی تحلیل شده‌اند. نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که هر دو رویکرد در اصولی همچون توجه به اقلیم، استفاده بهینه از منابع طبیعی، احترام به بستر طبیعی و تأمین آسایش حرارتی اشتراک دارند؛ با این تفاوت که معماری سنتی ایرانی این اهداف را به‌صورت تجربی و بومی، و معماری پایدار معاصر به‌صورت نظام‌مند، محاسباتی و با بهره‌گیری از فناوری‌های نوین دنبال می‌کند. همچنین تفاوت‌هایی در فرایند طراحی، نوع مصالح، مقیاس مداخلات و نقش فناوری میان این دو رویکرد مشاهده می‌شود. در نهایت، مقاله بر این نکته تأکید دارد که بازخوانی و تلفیق اصول معماری سنتی ایرانی و معماری پایدار معاصر می‌تواند به خلق الگوهای طراحی کارآمد، هویت‌مند و سازگار با محیط‌زیست در معماری امروز منجر شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparative Analysis of Design Formation in Traditional Iranian and Contemporary Sustainable Architecture

نویسندگان [English]

  • Maryam Saffar 1
  • Mohammad Ali Kazemzadeh Raef 2
1 khuzestan Academic center for Education Culture and Research (ACECR ) ahvaz
2 Assistant Professor, PhD in Architecture, Department of Architectural Engineering, Jahad Daneshgahi Khuzestan Institute of Higher Education, Ahvaz, Iran
چکیده [English]

Iranian traditional architecture is the outcome of centuries ofenvironmental,cultural,andclimaticexperience. Throughout its formative process, it developed intelligent strategies for achieving human comfort and establishing harmony with nature. In contrast, sustainable architecture, drawing on scientific approaches, modern technologies, and growing environmental concerns, seeks to minimize the adverse impacts of construction on the environment while improving the quality of human life. This study aims to investigate the similarities and differences in the design ـ formation processes of traditional Iranian architecture and contemporary sustainable architecture. The research adopts a qualitative methodology based on library research, a descriptive ـ analytical approach, and comparative analysis. In this process, the principal factors influencing the formation of architectural designs in both approaches were identified, extracted, and comparatively analyzed. The findings indicate that both approaches share fundamental principles, including responsiveness to climate, efficient use of natural resources, respect for the natural context, and the provision of thermal comfort. Nevertheless, traditional Iranian architecture pursues these objectives through indigenous knowledge, accumulated experience, and empirical methods, whereas contemporary sustainable architecture addresses them systematically and quantitatively through scientific analysis, performance assessment, and advanced technologies. Furthermore, significant differences can be observed in the design process, material selection, scale of intervention, and the role of technology. Ultimately, the study emphasizes that reinterpreting and integrating the principles of traditional Iranian architecture with the scientific and technological achievements of contemporary sustainable architecture can contribute to the development of efficient, identity ـ oriented, and environmentally responsive design models for contemporary architecture.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Design Process
  • Sustainable Architecture
  • Traditional Iranian
  • Iran
Aminzadeh. (2003). The impact of biology and ecology on architecture.
Assarzadeh. (2016). The impact of orientation and window geometry on the thermal performance of buildings in various Iranian climates. Energy and Buildings, 5(1), 50.
Beheshti, & Safavi. (2013). Thermal performance analysis of windcatchers in the hot and dry climate of Iran. Journal of Management and Structural Engineering, 3(2), 45 ـ 58.
Bromand, et al. (2020). Energy simulation of traditional buildings using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software. Journal of Iranian Architectural Research, 8(16), 129.
Contextual Arch. (n.d.). Contextual Arch. Retrieved from https://contextualarch.com
Daneshchi. (n.d.). Daneshchi. Retrieved from https://www.daneshchi.ir
Engz. (n.d.). Engz. Retrieved from https://www.engz.ir
Gholamzadeh, E. (2023). Sustainable architecture through the use of traditional Iranian architecture. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Architecture, Civil Engineering, Urban Planning, Environment, and Horizons of Islamic Art in the Statement of the Second Step of the Revolution.
Ghobadian, V. (1998). Principles and methods of climatic design. Shahid Beheshti University Press.
Habibi. (2000). Space and function in Iranian architecture. University of Tehran Press.
Hajisidi. (2017). Sustainability approach in Iranian vernacular architecture: A comparative study based on global indices. Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Architecture and Urbanism.
Hamzavi, H. (2015). Another approach to sustainable architecture with a perspective on Iranian traditional architecture. Proceedings of the International Conference on Novel Research in Civil Engineering, Architecture, and Urbanism.
Hasanqoli ـ Nejad Yasouri, K, et al. (2019). Sustainability standards in the formation of the structure and architectural elements of hot and dry climate architecture. Journal of Islamic Art Studies.
Jomehzadeh, F, et al. (2017). A review on windcatchers for passive cooling and natural ventilation in buildings, Part 1: Indoor air quality and thermal comfort assessment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 736 ـ 756.
Karimi Dastjerdi, & Akbari. (2025). Sustainable architecture utilizing Iranian traditional architecture. Proceedings of the International Conference of Tabriz Art University.
Kasmaei, A. (2017). Similarities and differences between traditional and sustainable architecture. Proceedings of the Fourth National Conference on Architecture and Urban Planning: Sustainability and Resilience from Ideal to Reality.
Madahi, S. M, et al. (2017). The process of climatic design based on the sustainable architecture approach. Proceedings of the International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture, and Urban Planning in Contemporary Iran.
Mirmiran. (2006). History of Iranian architecture. Agah Publications.
Mousavi, S. M. R, Parseh, B, & Zolqi, S. (2016). Investigating the relationship between traditional architecture and sustainable architecture. Proceedings of the National Conference on Tourism Culture and Urban Identity. https://sid.ir/paper/874591/fa
Pirnia, M. K. (2003). Styles of Iranian architecture. Agah Publications.
Rahmani, A. (2015). The role of vernacular architecture in achieving and expressing sustainable architecture. Proceedings of the National Conference on Iranian Vernacular Architecture and Urban Planning.
Sadeghi, & Mohammadpour. (2014). Comparison of embodied energy in traditional and modern building materials. Journal of Building Research, (4), 77 ـ 90.
Journal of Fine Arts, Architecture and Urbanism, (38), 22 ـ 33.
Seeiran. (n.d.). Seeiran. Retrieved from http://www.seeiran.ir
Seyedine, & Eskandari. (2015). Energy efficiency in buildings: An overview of passive and active design principles. Iran University of Science and Technology Press.
Sheikh ـ Eslami, A, & Abdollahi ـ Far, M. (2016). A comparative study of vernacular architecture and the principles of sustainable architecture: A case study of residential buildings and structures in Khorramabad. Proceedings of the First National Conference on Architecture and Urban Planning: Ideas, Theories, and Methods.
Soflaei, F, Shokouhian, M, & Mofidi Shemirani, S. M. (2016). Traditional Iranian courtyards as microclimate modifiers by considering orientation, dimensions, and proportions. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 5(2), 225 ـ 238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2016.02.002
Tabesh, S, & Tahbaz, M. (2020). Analysis of the climatic design process in vernacular housing of Iran’s hot ـ dry regions based on behavioral patterns. Iranian Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning, 11(2), 45 ـ 58.
Yari, A, et al. (n.d.). Sustainable architecture in Iranian traditional architecture.
Zeynalian, M. (2016). A comparative study of the components of sustainable development in Iranian ـ Islamic architecture. Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Research in Architecture, Urban Planning, and Urban Management.
دوره 1، شماره 3
مهر 1405
صفحه 86-98
  • تاریخ دریافت: 04 اسفند 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 01 شهریور 1405
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 04 شهریور 1405
  • تاریخ انتشار: 01 مهر 1405